Digital resources in the Social Sciences and Humanities OpenEdition Our platforms OpenEdition Books OpenEdition Journals Hypotheses Calenda Libraries OpenEdition Freemium Follow us

International Forum 2020: “Wellbeing and Subjectivities across the Global South” / Futures under Construction

Pesquisadores de estudos de mídia, comunicação e antropologia da UFF participam durante o mês de julho do Fórum Internacional “Futuros em construção: bem-estar e subjetividades no Sul Global”, realizado pela Universidade de Tübingen, na Alemanha. O evento é transmitido inteiramente em ambiente digital, gratuitamente. Os interessados podem encontrar mais informações no site.

Ao final da página, há um campo para inscrição. Por favor, é preciso fazer a inscrição para ter acessos às salas virtuais.

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=2966974806672251&id=1233539650015784&__xts__[0]=68.ARCXRM63JSso9kwqOi8D6Al-R8iUPIcTwwv2RWnQY__gjybfkzwm6OnKkagxiXu6yVPEuEYvNajEOHRv35GbnfYcQ2M92zrZviyVW2QEX2EJevmXkgU27IbJ47siVrpZaIuyJoyGfdyy_Zrluc3MmQhhabrJEJaS8Sx6_5tiad_Gpwh6WZ7f1kKPV9MaIKr-ShhsG3Kz_kAqUWkeikc3wPa57gQtWXafIKAPdRQexFBh-aTwMxQWS4RY1lQqDuxTq7-H2U_id5jyzU2k7GIcECmHUie6gVuBrrTb-bEIv5GJq941xyamVdKN2bF154ALUtldJGD6i63zEzJ-nqvQvU8Eakib&__tn__=-R

“Urban interventionism” in welfare and planning: National typologies and “local cultures” in Europe

A Patrícia Pereira, em co-autoria com Juliet Carpenter, Olivier Dlabac e Roman Zwicky, publicou um artigo na revista Journal of Urban Affairs. Mais, aqui.

Segue aqui o resumo:

Comparative research on welfare and planning has traditionally been based on broadly defined typologies of national welfare state and planning systems, thereby neglecting the role of local “cultures” that help sustain and redevelop underlying institutions and practices. Drawing on a European-wide survey of city mayors, we explore how well the established typologies are reproduced in local welfare and planning cultures, as reflected in mayoral attitudes, and whether there are systematic variations of welfare and planning cultures even within the same country. The findings suggest that nationally based categories of welfare regimes and planning systems do not necessarily correspond with mayors’ preferences for “urban intervention” in service delivery, housing provision, or planning. Local specificities, including permeability to the influence of European institutions and policies, may in fact have a significant impact on mayors’ attitudes in these fields, possibly creating new local understandings as well as pressures for reforming national welfare and planning systems. These conclusions strengthen the argument that “local cultures” are presenting a challenge to national typologies of planning and welfare, and are important elements to take into account when exploring the evolution of urban policies at the local level.